It was Christmas 1961. I was teaching in a small town in Ohio where my twenty-seven third graders eagerly anticipated the great day of gifts giving.

A tree covered with tinsel and gaudy paper chains graced one corner. In another rested a manger scene produced from cardboard and poster paints by chubby, and sometimes grubby, hands. Someone had brought a doll and placed it on the straw in the cardboard box that served as the manger. It didn’t matter that you could pull a string and hear the blue-eyed, golden-haired dolly say, “My name is Susie.” “But Jesus was a boy baby!” one of the boys proclaimed. Nonetheless, Susie stayed.

 Each day the children produced some new wonder — strings of popcorn, hand-made trinkets, and German bells made from wallpaper samples, which we hung from the ceiling. Through it all she remained aloof, watching from afar, seemingly miles away. I wondered what would happen to this quiet child, once so happy, now so suddenly withdrawn. I hoped the festivities would appeal to her. But nothing did. We made cards and gifts for mothers and dads, for sisters and brothers, for grandparents, and for each other. At home the students made the popular fried marbles and vied with one another to bring in the prettiest ones. ” You put them in a hot frying pan, Teacher. And you let them get real hot, and then you watch what happens inside. But you don’t fry them too long or they break.”So, as my gift to them, I made each of my students a little pouch for carrying their fried marbles. And I knew they had each made something for me: bookmarks carefully cut, colored, and sometimes pasted together; cards and special drawings; liquid embroidery doilies, hand-fringed, of course.

The day of gift-giving finally came. We oohed and aahed over our handiwork as the presents were exchanged. Through it all, she sat quietly watching. I had made a special pouch for her, red and green with white lace. I wanted very much to see her smile. She opened the package so slowly and carefully. I waited but she turned away. I had not penetrated the wall of isolation she had built around herself.

 After school the children left in little groups, chattering about the great day yet to come when long-hoped-for two-wheelers and bright sleds would appear beside their trees at home. She lingered, watching them bundle up and go out the door. I sat down in a child-sized chair to catch my breath, hardly aware of what was happening, when she came to me with outstretched hands, bearing a small white box, unwrapped and slightly soiled, as though it had been held many times by unwashed, childish hands. She said nothing. “For me?” I asked with a weak smile. She said not a word, but nodded her head. I took the box and gingerly opened it. There inside, glistening green, a fried marble hung from a golden chain. Then I looked into that elderly eight-year-old face and saw the question in her dark brown eyes. In a flash I knew — she had made it for her mother, a mother she would never see again, a mother who would never hold her or brush her hair or share a funny story, a mother who would never again hear her childish joys or sorrows. A mother who had taken her own life just three weeks before.

 I held out the chain. She took it in both her hands, reached forward, and secured the simple clasp at the back of my neck. She stepped back then as if to see that all was well. I looked down at the shiny piece of glass and the tarnished golden chain, then back at the giver. I meant it when I whispered,” Oh, Maria, it is so beautiful. She would have loved it.”Neither of us could stop the tears. She stumbled into my arms and we wept together. And for that brief moment I became her mother, for she had given me the greatest gift of all: herself.

One fine afternoon I was walking along Fifth Avenue, when I remembered that it was necessary to buy a pair of socks. I turned into the first sock shop that caught my eye, and a boy clerk who could not have been more than seventeen years old came forward. “What can I do for you, sir?” “I wish to buy a pair of socks.” His eyes glowed. There was a note of passion in his voice. “Did you know that you had come into the finest place in the world to buy socks?” I had not been aware of that, as my entrance had been accidental. “Come with me,” said the boy, ecstatically. I followed him to the rear of the shop, and he began to haul down from the shelves box after box, displaying their contents for my delectation.
“Hold on, lad, I am going to buy only one pair!” “I know that,” said he, “but I want you to see how marvelously beautiful these are. Aren’t they wonderful?” There was on his face an expression of solemn and holy rapture, as if he were revealing to me the mysteries of his religion. I became far more interested in him than in the socks. I looked at him in amazement. “My friend,” said I, “if you can keep this up, if this is not merely the enthusiasm that comes from novelty, from having a new job, if you can keep up this zeal and excitement day after day, in ten years you will own every sock in the United States.”
My amazement at his pride and joy in salesmanship will be easily understood by all who read this article. In many shops the customer has to wait for someone to wait upon him. And when finally some clerk does deign to notice you, you are made to feel as if you were interrupting him. Either he is absorbed in profound thought in which he hates to be disturbed or he is skylarking with a girl clerk and you feel like apologizing for thrusting yourself into such intimacy.
He displays no interest either in you or in the goods he is paid to sell. Yet possibly that very clerk who is now so apathetic began his career with hope and enthusiasm. The daily grind was too much for him; the novelty wore off; his only pleasures were found outside of working hours. He became a mechanical, not inspired, salesman. After being mechanical, he became incompetent; then he saw younger clerks who had more zest in their work, promoted over him. He became sour. That was the last stage. His usefulness was over.
I have observed this melancholy decline in the lives of so many men in so many occupations that I have come to the conclusion that the surest road to failure is to do things mechanically. There are many teachers in schools and colleges who seem duller than the dullest of their pupils; they go through the motions of teaching, but they are as impersonal as a telephone.

 About a decade ago, university students could find satisfactory and enviable jobs after their graduation. But now, things are different. Today’s university students usually have much pressure in finding fairly good jobs. They always say disappointedly that graduation means joblessness. Why nowadays university students have so much pressure in finding jobs?

    In my opinion, this kind of pressure is mainly caused by three reasons.

    Firstly, the government is enrolling more and more university students year by year. And the growth of the students’ number has surpassed that of the need of the society. So, when so many students graduate at a time, the chance of finding jobs becomes tiny.

    Secondly, today’s university students, most of them are the “only-child”, who are more mentally frail. Since they are indulged greatly at home and haven’t been trained to do things on their own, once it is their turn to go out of the campus and find jobs by themselves and decide what kind of jobs to choose, they feel bewildered and don’t know what to do. If their first try fails, they will be frustrated and think that it is really hard to find jobs.

    Thirdly, some university students are not qualified for good and challenging jobs. After entering the university, they don’t study as hard as they did in high schools. They begin to sleep during the class or even be absent for classes. Some are addicted to computer games or Jin Yong’s novels, or step into the two-person-world too early. Because these things have taken up so much of their time and energy, their study is neglected. After four years of university life, they haven’t gained the knowledge those fairly good jobs or certain positions require.

The one thing that matters more to me than anything else in the world is you and me. You are my world. You’re the one who gets all my love and my wishes and my prayers. But somehow despite all my best intentions, I never feel quite safe enough or sure enough to rest assured that I’ll always be able to make you happy. I need to know. I need you more than my words can say. I need to always feel the warm peaceful feeling that I get when you hold me. I need to experience the beauty of our love that I gently receive when we caress. I need for us to remember all the love that’s been given and all the love that will unfold each day, between the wonder of you and the warmth of me.

And sometimes, I just need to know that we’ll be okay won’t we?

Blue ear disease occurred in Vietnam ’s southern Tien Giang province with 380 infected pigs, the Vietnam News Agency reported Monday.

The agency quoted Tien Giang provincial government as reporting that the disease struck nine communes of the province.

To prevent the spread of the disease, local authorities have taken prevention measures including the destruction of all infected pigs.

Other measures have been also implemented such as sterilizing the affected areas and their neighborhood and containing movements of traffic in these places to curb the disease from spreading.

The local authorities have decided to give affected farmers 25, 000 Vietnamese dong (about 1.3 dollars) for per kilo of animals lost, said the report.

Source: Xinhua

Mauritius has recorded the first victim who succumbed to A/ H1N1 flu in 2010, local medical sources reported over the weekend.

A government official aged 51 died on Saturday night in a private clinic after having been admitted on July 4 for what was believed to be a flu.

After his health status started deteriorating rapidly, he was transferred to the intensive care unit.

Doctors indicated that he died from a viral infection with respiratory distress. Tests that were carried out on this patient early last week confirmed the presence of the A/H1N1 virus.

Several suspected cases of A/H1N1 virus have been detected in both private and public health centers.

According to information received from the private clinic, the victim had suffered from the flu for about 15 days.

Despite the antibiotics that had been prescribed by his doctor, his health status did not improve hence his hospitalization.

According to a number of doctors in Mauritius, the resurgence of the A/ H1N1 virus is now a reality. Already, in the beginning of the week, several doctors in private clinics had raised the alarm about the re-emergence of this virus in Mauritius.

Source: Xinhua

In  1903, Parisian Edmond Jaeger challenged Jacques-David LeCoultre, grandson of Antoine, to manufacture ultra-thin calibers of his design. Out of their relationship emerged a collection of ultra-thin pocket watches, followed by others that eventually, in 1937, officially culminated in the Jaeger-LeCoultre brand.In 1907, French jeweler Cartier, a client of Jaeger’s, signed a contract with the Parisian watchmaker under which all Jaeger’s movement designs for a period of 15 years would be exclusive to Cartier. The movements were produced by LeCoultre. Also in 1907, the LeCoultre Caliber 145 set the record for the thinnest movement at 1.38 mm. JLC began manufacturing the Atmos clock in 1936 after purchasing the patent from Jean-Leon Reutter, who invented it in 1928. The company was officially renamed Jaeger-LeCoultre in 1937. In 1941, Jaeger-LeCoultre earned the highest distinction from the Neuchatel Observatory for its tourbillon Caliber 170. In 1982, the Jaeger-LeCoultre museum was established in Le Sentier. In 2009, JLC produced the world’s most complicated wristwatch, the Hybris Mechanica à Grande Sonnerie with 26 complications.

Watches sold in North America were sold under the LeCoultre name from 1932 to approximately 1985. After that the Jaeger-LeCoultre name was adopted uniformly worldwide. According to factory records, the last movement to be used in an American LeCoultre watch shipped out of Le Sentier in 1976.

There is substantial confusion over the use of LeCoultre name for the North American market. Some collectors and misinformed dealers make the erroneous claim that the American LeCoultre has nothing to do with Jaeger-LeCoultre Switzerland. The confusion stems from the fact that, in the 1950s, the North American distributor of LeCoultre watches was the Longines-Wittnauer Group, which was also responsible for the distribution of Vacheron Constantin timepieces. Collectors have confused this distribution channel with the manufacture of the watches. Outside the actual distribution channel, the LeCoultre product, at the manufacturing level, had nothing to do with either Longines, Wittnauer or Vacheron Constantin. In addition, the LeCoultre trademark was owned by the Société Anonyme de la Fabrique D’Horlogerie LeCoultre & Cie, Le Sentier. The LeCoultre trademark expired and was replaced by the Jaeger-LeCoultre trademark in 1985.

Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) announced on Friday the application of the Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Repurchases (Codes) to SFC-authorized real estate investment trusts (REITs) with immediate effect.

Released Friday are consultation conclusions on the proposals to extend the Codes to REITs and to apply the market misconduct and disclosure of interests provisions in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO) to listed collective investment schemes ( CISs) (Note 1).

“We believe that the implementation of the proposals represent a significant step forward in establishing a regulatory framework that better protects the investors’ interests and assists the further development of the REIT market in Hong Kong,” said Martin Wheatley, the SFC’s Chief Executive Officer.

According to the SFC, unitholders who increase their holding to 30 percent or more will be subject to the trigger provisions under the Codes.

Likewise, unitholders holding between 30 percent and 50 percent who increase their holding by more than 2 percent from the relevant lowest percentage in the 12-month period preceding the relevant increase in holding will also be subject to the creeper provisions of the Codes.

Oscar-winning filmmaker Danny Boyle will direct the London 2012 Olympic opening ceremony, organizers said on Thursday, and he immediately promised a “thrilling welcome” for both athletes and the world.

Boyle, whose work includes “Shallow Grave,” “Trainspotting” and the hugely successful “Slumdog Millionaire,” acknowledged it may not be on the same scale as the last Games in Beijing, but he promised a “genuine and personal welcome.”

British director and producer Stephen Daldry, who has been involved with “Billy Elliot,” “The Hours” and “The Reader,” will be part of a four-man team which will oversee the opening and closing ceremonies for both the Olympic and Paralympics.

They will work within a total budget of 40 million pounds, which will come out of the overall 2 billion pound budget of Locog, the organization responsible for staging the Games.

A global TV audience of 1 billion people watched Beijing’s spectacular opening ceremony in 2008, which set the benchmark against previous ceremonies often deemed woeful and cheesy.

“You have got to acknowledge that it is not going to be like Beijing in terms of this overwhelming, intimidating scale,” Boyle told reporters.

“It will be more modest than that. But our job is to make sure that within those means it is spectacular and delivers a thrilling welcoming to the opening of the Games.”

There were few hints about what would be included, except that the lighting of the Olympic torch was central to their thinking, and “zombies would not be running around on stage.”

“I want to provide something fitting for this world event,” he added.

There were hints that part of the ceremony could be “bounced out” of the stadium.

Locog chairman Seb Coe said it was important not to just ape previous ceremonies, but to portray the different cities and their backgrounds.

Boyle, who has lived in east London where the Games will be held, said he jumped at the chance of being artistic director, and would take inspiration from sporting excellence and the city which had given him so many opportunities.

He will work on the project full-time from early next year after he has completed two projects he is already committed to including a stage production of “Frankenstein.”

Boyle, who said he was a better sports fan than competitor, praised the intimacy of the 80,000-seat main stadium where the ceremonies will be held, describing it as a “little wonder.”

Daldry said he did not view the project as a poisoned chalice.

They would not be tied to the 8-minute show put on by London during the hand-over ceremony in Beijing, organizers said.

The slot, which featured a red London bus and bowler-hatted dancers, cost 1.5 million pounds, but was widely criticized.

“It is a different show, and a different team,” Martin Green, Locog’s head of ceremonies, told Reuters.